Description:
The objective of this randomized phase II is to evaluate the benefit of regorafenib for
ovarian patients who reported a confirmed elevated CA-125 level under surveillance or
bevacizumab, compared with tamoxifen.
Title
- Brief Title: REGorafenib vsTamoxifen in Patients With Platinum-sensitive OVARian Carcinoma and Isolated Biological Progression
- Official Title: A Randomized, Open-label, Comparative, Multicenter, Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of REGorafenib Versus Tamoxifen in Patients With Platinum-sensitive OVARian Carcinoma and Isolated Biological Progression
Clinical Trial IDs
- ORG STUDY ID:
GINECO-OV235
- NCT ID:
NCT02584465
Conditions
Interventions
Drug | Synonyms | Arms |
---|
Tamoxifen | | A-Tamoxifen |
Regorafenib | | B-Regorafenib |
Purpose
The objective of this randomized phase II is to evaluate the benefit of regorafenib for
ovarian patients who reported a confirmed elevated CA-125 level under surveillance or
bevacizumab, compared with tamoxifen.
Detailed Description
- After surgery, most of patients with advanced ovarian/primitive peritoneal /fallopian
carcinoma received as first line treatment, carboplatin plus paclitaxel plus or minus
bevacizumab for 6 cycles followed by surveillance or bevacizumab maintenance therapy up
to one year (GOG (Burger et al.), ICON7 (Perren et al.), French national guidelines
Saint Paul de Vence (www.arcagy.org)).
- This multi-modality approach achieves clinical responses in about 70% of patients,
although a majority of women eventually relapse and die from disease progression. The
first sign of relapse can be a progressively rising CA-125 (Tuxen et al.).
- Biochemical-recurrent of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) is defined as CA-125 elevation
above normal values without clinical evidence of disease, and can predate clinical
disease by approximately 3-6 months (Tuxen et al.). Even if CA-125 elevation is a
harbinger of EOC relapse, the question remains as to whether early therapeutic
intervention can translate into extending the duration of survival.
- A few years ago, Rustin reported from ovarian cancer patients on surveillance after
first line treatment with isolated elevated CA-125 (without RECIST/symptoms criteria)
that there was no benefit to initiate a new chemotherapy compared to surveillance
(Rustin et al. Lancet 2010; Rustin et al. Ann Oncol 2011).
- For patients under bevacizumab on maintenance phase at the time of the CA-125 elevation
without RECIST or symptoms progression, data are scare. In the GOG0218 trial, elevated
CA-125 did not totally complied with RECIST criteria progression. This study reported
that the median PFS is longer in patients with continuous bevacizumab (14.1 months),
compared to patients under placebo (10.3 months), using CA-125 & RECIST criteria,
supporting the hypothesis that a maintenance treatment with an anti angiogenic agent
allows delaying disease progression (Burger et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011). In an
analysis of progression-free survival in which data for patients with increased CA-125
levels were censored, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months in the
control group but 18.0 months in the bevacizumab-throughout group (hazard ratio, 0.645;
P<0.001). The relationship of CA-125 to progressive disease (PD) may be altered in
bevacizumab (BV)-treated patients. In the Ocean trial elevated CA-125 was associated
with forthcoming progression for the majority of the patients under bevacizumab (HR
0.48) in the platinum sensitive population (Aghajanian et al.).
- Current international recommendations are to continue the same strategy (surveillance or
maintenance bevacizumab) until RECIST or symptomatic progression regardless of the
CA-125 level.
- However, some can argue that a waiting attitude is deemed unacceptable due to patient
anxiety over a rising CA-125 compelling a significant proportion of physicians to
propose a therapeutic intervention, due to the nearness of the disease progression.
- Tamoxifen is an endocrine alternative treatment option in patients with rising CA-125.
Hurteau et al. studies supported the use of tamoxifen showing a 17% response rate in
measurable recurrent disease, 13% response rate in platinum resistant disease, observed
stable disease in 38% of patients lasting a median of 3 months (Hatch, et al).
- The use of tamoxifen treatment as a control arm for isolated CA-125 is thus justified
based on a favorable toxicity profile compared with available cytotoxic agents and the
lack of interference with subsequent interventions beyond documentation of clinical
progression (Marckman, et al). As patients have until today no benefit to introduce a
new chemotherapy regimen for isolated elevated CA-125 (Rustin et al 2010), exploring new
anti-angiogenic agent could be clinically relevant. Agents that inhibit tumor
angiogenesis and invasion were considered to be ideal candidates for the experimental
arm given their potential to prolong the duration of disease-free survival while
exhibiting a more favorable toxicity profile than cytotoxic drugs.
- Pazopanib and other multi-kinase inhibitors such as cediranib, nintenanib reported
activity in relapsing ovarian cancer (sensitive or resistant population) used alone in
several phase II trials (Matulonis et al., Ledermann et al., and Friedlander et al.).
- Regorafenib is a new oral multi-kinase inhibitor. It inhibits kinases involved in
angiogenesis (VEGFR 1-3, TIE 2), signaling in the tumor microenvironment (PDGFR-β, FGFR)
and oncogenesis (KIT, RET and BRAF). Inhibition of tumor growth and formation of
metastases were shown in vivo. Tumor activity has been reported in a variety of tumor
types. Regorafenib is approved in Europe for the treatment of metastatic colorectal
cancer in patients previously treated with, or who are not considered candidates for,
available therapies. An application for GIST progressing after imatinib and sunitinib
has obtained the AMM in Europe. The recommended dose is 160 mg taken once daily for 3
weeks followed by 1 week off therapy.
The objective of this randomized phase II is to evaluate the benefit of regorafenib for
ovarian patients who reported a confirmed elevated CA-125 level under surveillance or
bevacizumab, compared with tamoxifen.
Trial Arms
Name | Type | Description | Interventions |
---|
A-Tamoxifen | Active Comparator | Tamoxifen 40mg/day 2 film-coated tablet containing 20 mg of Tamoxifen/day until progression | |
B-Regorafenib | Experimental | Regorafenib 120mg/day 3 film-coated tablet containing 40 mg of Regorafenib/day, 3 weeks/4 until progression | |
Eligibility Criteria
Main Inclusion Criteria:
I2 Histological confirmation of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal
cancer, I3 Rising CA-125 (according to the Rustin/GCIG criteria, see appendix 10))
occurring more than 6 months after the last platinum-based chemotherapy cycle (platinum
sensitive), I4 No symptom related to ovarian cancer progression, I6 1 or 2 prior lines of
platinum-based chemotherapy followed either by surveillance or bevacizumab or olaparib
(outside therapeutic trial) maintenance, I7 Before randomization, patients must be in CR,
PR or SD (RECIST version 1.1) under surveillance or maintenance with bevacizumab or
olaparib,
I8 Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions as assessed by the following laboratory
tests conducted within 7 days before randomization:
- Absolute Neutrophil Count ≥ 1.5 G/L, platelets count ≥ 100 G/L, and hemoglobin ≥
9g/dL,
- AST/ALT ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (or ≤ 5.0 x ULN if liver metastasis) and
total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN
- Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN,
- Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² according to the Modification of
Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) abbreviated formula
- Lipase ≤ 1.5 x ULN
- Prothrombine time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) < 1.5 x ULN. Patients who
are therapeutically anticoagulated with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be
allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence of underlying abnormality in
this parameter exists, I9 Women of childbearing potential and partners must agree to
use adequate contraceptive method (if no previous bilateral annexectomies) during the
whole study period and for up to 6 months after the last dose of study treatment; a
negative pregnancy test must be obtained prior to randomization,
Main Exclusion Criteria:
E4 Past or concurrent history of neoplasm other than ovarian cancer, except for in situ
carcinoma of the cervix uteri, in situ breast cancer and/or basal cell epithelioma. All
treats and cures cancer more than 3 years before the study entry is allowed E5 Known
history or symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors (head CT or MRI at screening to
confirm the absence of central nervous system (CNS) disease if the patient has symptoms
suggestive or consistent with progressive CNS disease), E6 Any prior radiotherapy to the
pelvis or abdomen; surgery (including open biopsy) within 4 weeks before starting study
drugs (24 hours for minor surgical procedures), or planned major surgery during the study
treatment period, E7 Any prior treatment with anti angiogenic agent such as pazopanib,
nintedanib or cediranib.
E8 Endocrine therapy administered within 3 years prior to randomization,
E13 History of any of the following :
- abdominal fistula,
- gastrointestinal perforation,
- intra-abdominal abscess,
- any malabsorption condition, E14 Clinically significant bleeding NCI-CTCAE version 4.3
Grade 3 or higher within 30 days before randomization, E15 Congestive heart failure
New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ class 2, E17 Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic
blood pressure (BP) > 150 mmHg or diastolic pressure > 90 mmHg despite optimal medical
management), E21 Ongoing infection > Grade 2 according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.3.
Hepatitis B is allowed if no active replication is present. Hepatitis C is allowed if
no antiviral treatment is required, E23 Interstitial lung disease with ongoing signs
and symptoms at the time of screening,
Maximum Eligible Age: | N/A |
Minimum Eligible Age: | 18 Years |
Eligible Gender: | Female |
Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Primary Outcome Measures
Measure: | Progression Free survival (PFS) |
Time Frame: | 4 months |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | PFS according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria, based on the investigator's assessment. |
Secondary Outcome Measures
Measure: | Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
Time Frame: | 4 months |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | |
Measure: | Time to start of first subsequent chemotherapy (TFST) |
Time Frame: | 5 months |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | |
Measure: | Second progression-Free Survival (PFS2) |
Time Frame: | 6 months |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | PFS2 based on the investigator's assessment. |
Measure: | Overall Survival (OS) |
Time Frame: | 7 months |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | |
Measure: | Adverse events |
Time Frame: | 7 months |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | frequency of adverse events according to MedDRA terms |
Details
Phase: | Phase 2 |
Primary Purpose: | Interventional |
Overall Status: | Active, not recruiting |
Lead Sponsor: | ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP |
Last Updated
February 19, 2020