Clinical Trials /

Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

NCT02928224

Description:

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm Phase 3 study to evaluate encorafenib + cetuximab plus or minus binimetinib versus Investigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab, as controls, in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. The study contains a Safety Lead-in Phase in which the safety and tolerability of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab will be assessed prior to the Phase 3 portion of the study.

Related Conditions:
  • Colorectal Carcinoma
Recruiting Status:

Active, not recruiting

Phase:

Phase 3

Trial Eligibility

Document

Title

  • Brief Title: Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • Official Title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label, 3-Arm Phase 3 Study of Encorafenib + Cetuximab Plus or Minus Binimetinib vs. Irinotecan/Cetuximab or Infusional 5- Fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinic Acid (FA) /Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab With a Safety Lead-in of Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab in Patients With BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial IDs

  • ORG STUDY ID: ARRAY-818-302
  • SECONDARY ID: BEACON CRC
  • SECONDARY ID: 2015-005805-35
  • SECONDARY ID: C4221009
  • NCT ID: NCT02928224

Conditions

  • BRAF V600E-mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Interventions

DrugSynonymsArms
EncorafenibDoublet Arm
BinimetinibSafety Lead-in, Triplet Arm
CetuximabControl Arm
IrinotecanControl Arm
Folinic AcidFAControl Arm
5-Fluorouracil5-FUControl Arm

Purpose

This is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, 3-arm Phase 3 study to evaluate encorafenib + cetuximab plus or minus binimetinib versus Investigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab, as controls, in patients with BRAFV600E mCRC whose disease has progressed after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. The study contains a Safety Lead-in Phase in which the safety and tolerability of encorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab will be assessed prior to the Phase 3 portion of the study.

Trial Arms

NameTypeDescriptionInterventions
Safety Lead-in, Triplet ArmExperimentalEncorafenib + binimetinib + cetuximab.
  • Encorafenib
  • Binimetinib
  • Cetuximab
Doublet ArmExperimentalEncorafenib + cetuximab.
  • Encorafenib
  • Cetuximab
Control ArmActive ComparatorInvestigator's choice of either irinotecan/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab.
  • Cetuximab
  • Irinotecan
  • Folinic Acid
  • 5-Fluorouracil

Eligibility Criteria

        Key Inclusion Criteria:

          -  Age ≥ 18 years at time of informed consent

          -  Histologically- or cytologically-confirmed CRC that is metastatic

          -  Presence of BRAFV600E in tumor tissue as previously determined by a local assay at any
             time prior to Screening or by the central laboratory

          -  Progression of disease after 1 or 2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting

          -  Evidence of measurable or evaluable non-measurable disease per RECIST, v1.1

          -  Adequate bone marrow, cardiac, kidney and liver function

          -  Able to take oral medications

          -  Female patients are either postmenopausal for at least 1 year, are surgically sterile
             for at least 6 weeks, or must agree to take appropriate precautions to avoid pregnancy
             from screening through follow-up if of childbearing potential

          -  Males must agree to take appropriate precautions to avoid fathering a child from
             screening through follow-up

        Key Exclusion Criteria:

          -  Prior treatment with any RAF inhibitor, MEK inhibitor, cetuximab, panitumumab or other
             epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors

          -  Prior irinotecan hypersensitivity or toxicity that would suggest an inability to
             tolerate irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every 2 weeks

          -  Symptomatic brain metastasis or leptomeningeal disease

          -  History or current evidence of retinal vein occlusion or current risk factors for
             retinal vein occlusion (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension, history of
             hyperviscosity or hypercoagulability syndromes)

          -  Known history of acute or chronic pancreatitis

          -  History of chronic inflammatory bowel disease or Crohn's disease requiring medical
             intervention (immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive medications or surgery) ≤12 months
             prior to randomization

          -  Uncontrolled blood pressure despite medical treatment

          -  Impaired GI function or disease that may significantly alter the absorption of
             encorafenib or binimetinib (e.g., ulcerative diseases, uncontrolled vomiting,
             malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection with decreased intestinal absorption)

          -  Concurrent or previous other malignancy within 5 years of study entry, except cured
             basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, prostate
             intraepithelial neoplasm, carcinoma in-situ of the cervix, or other noninvasive or
             indolent malignancy

          -  History of thromboembolic or cerebrovascular events ≤ 6 months prior to starting study
             treatment, including transient ischemic attacks, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein
             thrombosis or pulmonary emboli

          -  Concurrent neuromuscular disorder that is associated with the potential of elevated
             creatine (phosphor)kinase (CK) (e.g., inflammatory myopathies, muscular dystrophy,
             amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy)

          -  Residual common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) ≥ Grade 2 toxicity
             from any prior anticancer therapy, with the exception of Grade 2 alopecia or Grade 2
             neuropathy

          -  Known history of HIV infection

          -  Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection

          -  Known history of Gilbert's syndrome

          -  Known contraindication to receive cetuximab or irinotecan at the planned doses
      
Maximum Eligible Age:N/A
Minimum Eligible Age:18 Years
Eligible Gender:All
Healthy Volunteers:No

Primary Outcome Measures

Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame:Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)
Safety Issue:
Description:Refer to AE/SAE section for additional data that were measured and analyzed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Response Rate (ORR) by BICR
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:ORR per RECIST, v1.1, defined as the number of patients achieving an overall best response of CR or partial response (PR) divided by the total number of patients
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Duration of Response (DOR) by BICR
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:DOR defined as the time from first radiographic evidence of response to the earliest documented disease progression or death due to underlying disease
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:Time to response defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Time to Response by BICR
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:Time to response defined as the time from first dose to first radiographic evidence of response
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Progression-free Survival (PFS) by BICR
Time Frame:Duration of safety lead-in, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:PFS defined as the time from first dose to the earliest documented disease progression or death due to any cause
Measure:(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Doublet Arm vs. Control Arm
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Overall Survival (OS) in Triplet Arm vs. Doublet Arm
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:Phase 3) Comparison of Objective Response Rate (ORR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Duration of Response (DOR) in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm by Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Doublet Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per BICR
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Comparison of Time to Response in Triplet Arm vs Doublet Arm Per Investigator
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients (QLQ-C30) Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating five functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global quality of life scale score; three symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and six stand alone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea) and perceived financial burden. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.
Measure:(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:FACT-C is a well-characterized and commonly used questionnaire that belongs to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Measurement System (FACIT). The FACT-G (G for general) questionnaire (27 questions) constitutes the core of all subscales and is applicable to all tumor types. The FACT-C questionnaire contains 9 additional questions on symptoms specific to CRC, 2 of which are only answered by patients with ostomy appliances. These 9 CRC-specific questions are categorized as "additional concerns" on the questionnaire and constitute the "colorectal cancer subscale" score. The patient self-reports his/her QoL for the previous 7 days. The overall score is calculated across all items and a higher score reflects better quality of life (QoL). The table summarizes the functional well-being subscale, the individual questions are linearly scaled and combined to form the functional well-being subscale score, which ranges from 0-28 (higher is better QoL).
Measure:(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:The EQ-5D-5L contains 1 item for each of 5 dimensions of health-related QoL (i.e., mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort and anxiety or depression). Response options for each item varied from having no problems to moderate problems or extreme problems. The EQ-5D-5L (v4.0) is a standardized measure of health utility that provides a single index value for one's health status. The EQ-5D-5L is frequently used for economic evaluations of health care and has been recognized as a valid and reliable instrument for this purpose. The EQ visual analog scale (VAS) is a score that is directly reported by the patient and ranges from 0 to 100 (higher is better quality health).
Measure:(Phase 3) Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) in Triplet Arm vs Control Arm, Doublet Arm vs Control, and Triplet vs Doublet
Time Frame:Duration of Phase 3, approximately 6 months (up to 28 days per cycle)
Safety Issue:
Description:The PGIC is a measure of patients' perceptions of change in their symptoms over time that can be used as an anchoring method to determine the minimal clinically important difference for other patient reported outcome (PROs). For this assessment, patients answered the following question: "Since starting treatment, my colorectal cancer symptoms are: (1) very much improved, (2) much improved, (3) minimally improved, (4) no change, (5) minimally worse, (6) much worse or (7) very much worse."
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Cetuximab
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Encorafenib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Binimetinib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Cetuximab
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Encorafenib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Binimetinib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Cetuximab
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Encorafenib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Binimetinib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Time of Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) for Metabolite of Binimetinib (AR00426032)
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-state Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Binimetinib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-state Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Encorafenib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-state Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for Cetuximab
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Safety Lead-in) Evaluation of the Steady-state Concentration Measured Just Before the Next Dose of Study Drug (Ctrough) for a Metabolite of Binimetinib
Time Frame:Predose and 1, 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycles 1 and 2
Safety Issue:
Description:
Measure:(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Encorafenib
Time Frame:2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2.
Safety Issue:
Description:The cross-arm CL/F value is based on the theta determined from a population PK analysis. Data for this Outcome Measure are not reported here because as per plan, the analysis includes pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID for those studies for which results have not yet been posted include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register.
Measure:(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Oral Clearance (CL/F) for Binimetinib
Time Frame:2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2.
Safety Issue:
Description:The cross-arm CL/F value is based on the theta determined from a population PK analysis. Data for this Outcome Measure are not reported here because as per plan, the analysis includes pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID for those studies for which results have not yet been posted include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register.
Measure:(Phase 3) Evaluation of the Model-Based Clearance (CL) for Cetuximab
Time Frame:2 and 6 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Predose and 2 hours post-dose on Day 1 of Cycle 2.
Safety Issue:
Description:The cross-arm CL/F value is based on the theta determined from a population PK analysis. Data for this Outcome Measure are not reported here because as per plan, the analysis includes pooled data from participants enrolled in multiple studies including those who were not enrolled in this study. The NCTID for those studies for which results have not yet been posted include: NCT01719380, NCT01543698, and NCT01436656. An additional study ARRAY-162-105 is not required to register.

Details

Phase:Phase 3
Primary Purpose:Interventional
Overall Status:Active, not recruiting
Lead Sponsor:Pfizer

Trial Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • BRAF
  • BRAFV600E

Last Updated

February 17, 2021