Description:
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly proliferating, neuroendocrine tumor that accounts
for about 15% of all lung cancers. Most patients have metastases at primary diagnosis
involving sites like bone, adrenal glands, liver and brain.
Compared with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) SCLC has a unique natural history with a
shorter doubling time, higher growth fraction, earlier development of widespread metastases,
and uniform initial response to chemo- or radiotherapy.
The combination of cis- or carboplatin and etoposide is the standard of care in the
first-line treatment of stage IV (extensive-disease) SCLC (ED-SCLC). Despite response rates
of 50-80%, most patients relapse within six months and the median survival time is less than
10 months. Between 14 and 23% of SCLC patients develop brain metastases.
New cytotoxic agents as well as targeted therapies have not been able to show any improvement
of survival in this group of patients.
Early phase trials of PD 1/PD L1-blocking immunotherapeutic agents in patients with recurrent
or ED SCLC have shown promising response rates and good tolerability. Immunotherapy may also
contribute to the efficacy of systemic treatment by maintaining initial responses to
chemotherapy. A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial indicates that the addition of
atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy significantly improves overall survival and
progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone in treatment-naïve patients with
ED-SCLC who are in good general condition (ECOG 0 or 1). However, about one in three SCLC
patients has a poor performance status (ECOG≥2), which is associated with even shorter
survival times of under eight months. At present, there is little information regarding the
feasibility, safety and efficacy of adding atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy for this
considerable fraction of patients.
The investigators expect, that atezolizumab in addition to chemotherapy is feasible in
patients with stage IV SCLC and reduced performance status and therefore crucial efficacy
data can be acquired in this trial to evaluate a putative Phase III transition in this
particular patient population.
Title
- Brief Title: Patients With ES-SCLC and ECOG PS=2 Receiving Atezolizumab-Carboplatin-Etoposide
- Official Title: Single-Arm Phase II-Study in Patients With Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) With Poor Performance Status Receiving Atezolizumab-Carboplatin-Etoposide
Clinical Trial IDs
- ORG STUDY ID:
AIO-TRK-0119
- NCT ID:
NCT04221529
Conditions
Interventions
Drug | Synonyms | Arms |
---|
Atezolizumab | | Atezolizumab |
Purpose
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a rapidly proliferating, neuroendocrine tumor that accounts
for about 15% of all lung cancers. Most patients have metastases at primary diagnosis
involving sites like bone, adrenal glands, liver and brain.
Compared with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) SCLC has a unique natural history with a
shorter doubling time, higher growth fraction, earlier development of widespread metastases,
and uniform initial response to chemo- or radiotherapy.
The combination of cis- or carboplatin and etoposide is the standard of care in the
first-line treatment of stage IV (extensive-disease) SCLC (ED-SCLC). Despite response rates
of 50-80%, most patients relapse within six months and the median survival time is less than
10 months. Between 14 and 23% of SCLC patients develop brain metastases.
New cytotoxic agents as well as targeted therapies have not been able to show any improvement
of survival in this group of patients.
Early phase trials of PD 1/PD L1-blocking immunotherapeutic agents in patients with recurrent
or ED SCLC have shown promising response rates and good tolerability. Immunotherapy may also
contribute to the efficacy of systemic treatment by maintaining initial responses to
chemotherapy. A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial indicates that the addition of
atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy significantly improves overall survival and
progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone in treatment-naïve patients with
ED-SCLC who are in good general condition (ECOG 0 or 1). However, about one in three SCLC
patients has a poor performance status (ECOG≥2), which is associated with even shorter
survival times of under eight months. At present, there is little information regarding the
feasibility, safety and efficacy of adding atezolizumab to standard chemotherapy for this
considerable fraction of patients.
The investigators expect, that atezolizumab in addition to chemotherapy is feasible in
patients with stage IV SCLC and reduced performance status and therefore crucial efficacy
data can be acquired in this trial to evaluate a putative Phase III transition in this
particular patient population.
Trial Arms
Name | Type | Description | Interventions |
---|
Atezolizumab | Experimental | Four 21-day cycles of induction therapy with atezolizumab+carboplatin+etoposide followed by 21-day cycles of maintenance therapy with atezolizumab. | |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Written informed consent including participation in translational research obtained
from the subject prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including
screening evaluations that are not SOC.
- ECOG 2
- At least one measurable tumor lesion (according to RECIST1.1)
- Histologically confirmed small cell lung cancer (SCLC)
- Stage IV disease (according to UICC8)
- No active autoimmune disease
- Adequate organ function defined as:
- neutrophil count > 1.5 x 109/L
- thrombocytes ≥ 100 x 109/L
- hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL
- INR ≤ 1.4 or aPTT ≤ 40 sec during the last 7 days before therapy [Subjects under
therapeutic anticoagulation are permitted.]
- bilirubin < 1.5 x ULN
- AST (SGOT)/ALT (SGPT) < 3 x institutional ULN (< 5 x ULN in case of liver
metastases)
- creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN or creatinine clearance ≥ 45 mL/min
- Availability of tumor tissue/block
- Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy
test (minimum sensitivity 25 IU/L or equivalent units of HCG) within 72 hours prior to
the first dose of IMP.
- Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must use appropriate method(s) of
contraception. [WOCBP should use an adequate method to avoid pregnancy for 6 months
after the last dose of IMP.]
- Men who are sexually active with WOCBP must use any contraceptive method with a
failure rate of less than 1% per year. Men receiving IMP and who are sexually active
with WOCBP will be instructed to adhere to contraception for a period of 6 months
after the last dose of IMP. Women who are not of childbearing potential (ie, who are
postmenopausal or surgically sterile) and men who are azoospermic do not require
contraception.
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study
including undergoing treatment and scheduled visits and examinations including
follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any preceding systemic anticancer therapy for stage IV SCLC. [Up to one
full-cycle-dosing of carboplatin+etoposide chemotherapy within the context of SOC is
permitted prior to study treatment.] (Note: Prior treatment for limited stage disease
allowed).
- Participation in another clinical study with an investigational product during the
last 30 days before inclusion or 7 half-lives of previously used trial medication,
whichever is longer
- Prior therapy with an anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1),
anti-Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1), anti-Programmed cell death-ligand 2
(anti-PD-L2), anti-CD137 (4-1BB ligand, a member of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor
[TNFR] family), or anti-Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4)
antibody (including ipilimumab or any other antibody or drug specifically targeting
T-cell co-stimulation or checkpoint pathways).
- Previous treatment in the present study (does not include screening failure).
- Symptomatic CNS metastases. [Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases may be
included.]
- Major surgery ≤ 28 days before first dose of study treatment
- Any uncontrolled systemic disease, condition or comorbidity that, in the opinion of
the investigator, would interfere with evaluation of study treatment or interpretation
of patient safety or study results, including but not limited to:
1. known active HBV, HCV or HIV infection [Patients who are HIV-positive are allowed
in the trial, so long as they are stable on anti-retroviral therapy, have a CD4
count ≥ 200 cells/μL, and have an undetectable viral load at the time of
screening.]
2. active tuberculosis
3. any other active infection requiring systemic therapy
4. history of allogeneic tissue/solid organ transplant
5. diagnosis of immunodeficiency or patient is receiving chronic systemic steroid
therapy or any other form of immunosuppressive therapy within 7 days prior to the
first dose of IMP
6. other active malignancy requiring treatment
7. clinically significant or symptomatic cardiovascular/cerebrovascular disease
(incl. myocardial infarction, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart
failure, serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia) within 6 months before
enrolment
- Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding or male/female patients of
reproductive potential who are not employing an effective method of birth control
(failure rate of less than 1% per year).
- Known hypersensitivity to carboplatin, etoposide or atezolizumab or any of the
constituents of the product.
- Medication that is known to interfere with any of the agents applied in the trial.
- Any condition or disease which might interfere with the subject's ability to comply
with the study procedures (e.g., dementia).
- Patient who has been incarcerated or involuntarily institutionalized by court order or
by the authorities [§ 40 Abs. 1 S. 3 Nr. 4 AMG].
- Patients who are unable to consent because they do not understand the nature,
significance and implications of the clinical trial and therefore cannot form a
rational intention in the light of the facts [§ 40 Abs. 1 S. 3 Nr. 3a AMG].
Maximum Eligible Age: | N/A |
Minimum Eligible Age: | 18 Years |
Eligible Gender: | All |
Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Primary Outcome Measures
Measure: | Overall survival (OS) |
Time Frame: | Measured from first dose of experimental IMP (or first dose of chemotherapy, whichever occurs first) through study completion, an average of one year. |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | OS is defined as the length of time from first dose of experimental IMP (or first dose of chemotherapy, whichever occurs first) to the date of death. A subject who has not died will be censored at last known date alive. |
Secondary Outcome Measures
Measure: | Objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST 1.1) |
Time Frame: | Starting from Screening up to an average of one year. |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | ORR is defined as the proportion of All Treated Subjects whose best overall response (BOR) from baseline is either a CR or PR per RECIST 1.1 criteria. BOR is determined by the best response designation recorded between the base-line assessment (must precede the date of first dose of IMP) and the date of objectively documented progression. For subjects without documented progression, all available response designations will contribute to the BOR determination. Among All Treated Subjects the ORR (based on investigator assessments according to RECIST 1.1) will be summarized by binomial response rates and their corresponding two-sided 95% exact CIs using Clopper-Pearson method. |
Measure: | Progression-free suvival (PFS) |
Time Frame: | Starting from Screening up to an average of one year. |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | PFS is defined as the time from first dose of IMP to the date of the first documented tumor progression, based on investigator assessments (per RECIST 1.1), or death due to any cause. |
Measure: | Incidence of Treatment-Emergent adverse events, serious adverse events and laboratory abnormalities leading to treatment discontinuation |
Time Frame: | Starting from Screening up to an average of one year. |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events and laboratory abnormalities leading to treatment discontinuation will be used as an indicator for safety and tolerability of the IMP. Toxicities in these incidents will be graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. |
Measure: | Quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) |
Time Frame: | Starting from Screening up to an average of one year. |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | QoL questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-C30, i.e. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire with 30 questions for patients with cancer) will be analyzed according to the respective recommendations and manuals (scoring and interpretation materials) issued by the creators of the instruments.
Patients have to answer 28 questions from "not at all" (1) to "very much" (4), where lower scores mean a better outcome. The last two questions range from "very poor" (1) to "excellent" (7), where higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Measure: | Quality of life (PRO-CTCAE) |
Time Frame: | Starting from Screening up to an average of one year. |
Safety Issue: | |
Description: | QoL questionnaires (PRO-CTCAE, i.e. Patient Reported Outcome - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) will be analyzed according to the respective recommendations and manuals (scoring and interpretation materials) issued by the creators of the instruments.
Patients have to answer 22 questions either ranging from "none", "mild", "moderate", "severe" to "very severe" or from "not at all", "a little bit", "somewhat", "quite a bit" to "very much". Lower values mean a better outcome. |
Details
Phase: | Phase 2 |
Primary Purpose: | Interventional |
Overall Status: | Recruiting |
Lead Sponsor: | AIO-Studien-gGmbH |
Trial Keywords
Last Updated
April 27, 2021